InnerView Confirms Implant Health When Symptoms Suggest Otherwise

Real-time data validated implant stability in a patient who felt movement — with no clinical signs of failure

The information in this case study pertains to future capabilities, currently under clinical evaluation – Not yet FDA cleared.

Challenge

Patient: 74 year old male

Tooth: #15

At age 74, a male patient reported that his implant felt loose while jogging, though he experienced no pain, swelling, or tenderness.

No evidence of movement on intraoral exam. X-rays were within normal limits. All screw-retained restorations were checked with hand-tightening; no movement observed.

Traditional Diagnostics & Limitations

A full exam revealed no clinical signs of concern:

• Intraoral exam: Implants #12–15 and #19 appeared stable
• Palpation and pressure testing: No detectable mobility
• Radiographs: Within normal limits (WNL)
• Restoration checks: Screw-retained restorations showed no movement upon hand-tightening

While traditional methods showed no signs of implant complications, the patient’s sensation persisted—prompting the use of InnerView for additional insight.

Results

The InnerView examination revealed consistent mobility readings across implants #12–15. Implant #19 showed values within normal limits (WNL). While some values appeared slightly elevated, they were consistent across all implants in the posterior maxilla. Based on intraoral examination and the absence of clinical signs of movement, the clinician determined it was reasonable to conclude these implants were well osseointegrated.

Slightly elevated NFE reading on #12; other implants (#13–15, #19) show consistent values.

A follow-up InnerView scan recorded consistent mobility readings across implants #12–15. Based on these readings and the absence of clinical signs during examination, Dr. Golan determined that the implants were not likely the source of the patient’s reported sensation.

The patient was referred to an ENT for further evaluation. A mild sinus infection was identified and treated. Following a short course of antibiotics, the patient reported that the sensation had resolved.

Key Takeaways: Why InnerView Mattered in This Case

Although traditional diagnostics showed no signs of implant issues, the patient continued to feel something was “off.”

InnerView provided objective data that supported the clinician’s decision to rule out implant instability—offering reassurance without additional invasive procedures.

With that clarity, Dr. Golan referred the patient to an ENT, who identified and treated a sinus infection. The patient later reported full symptom resolution.

InnerView supported the clinical workflow by helping guide the next steps, reduce uncertainty, and reinforce confidence in the stability of the existing restorations.