The InnerView System is transforming natural tooth and implant care by identifying changes in mechanical behavior early—before they escalate into costly complications—supporting more proactive clinical decision-making.
These case studies highlight how Quantitative Percussion Diagnostics (QPD) is being used in clinical settings to improve patient outcomes, reduce implant failures, and provide a deeper level of diagnostic insight beyond traditional methods.
A 90-year-old patient with extensive tooth wear had long resisted treatment, believing his teeth were stable. The InnerView System’s QPD analysis measured progressive micro-mobility in key teeth. Subsequent clinical evaluation identified hidden fractures, prompting timely intervention that prevented further damage.
Crown or Core FailureHidden MobilityNatural Tooth Evaluation+2
A 50-year-old patient was preparing for final restorations on two anterior implants that appeared clinically stable. But InnerView mobility measurements prompted further clinical evaluation and a decision to delay final crowns and adjust the treatment plan.
Asymptomatic PatientCrown or Core FailureHidden Mobility+6
A 75-year-old patient with a 20+ year implant history showed no symptoms during a hygiene visit—but the InnerView System measured elevated mobility in multiple sites, including one implant and several long-standing restorations.
Asymptomatic PatientCrown or Core FailureHidden Mobility+2
During a routine exam, a loose crown led to further testing—where the InnerView System measured elevated mobility at an adjacent implant site that appeared stable on X-rays. Following clinical evaluation, a minor adjustment corrected the issue before symptoms developed.
A 63-year-old patient presented with bite and cold sensitivity. While traditional diagnostics pointed to issues with Tooth #4, the InnerView System also measured unexpected mobility in Tooth #5—despite normal X-rays and exams.
A 68-year-old patient with a full-mouth reconstruction appeared to have stable implants during a routine exam—until InnerView measurements showed changes in mobility that prompted closer clinical evaluation.
A 35-year-old patient with a history of trauma and endodontic treatment presented with mobility in tooth #9. After immediate implant placement and guided healing, the InnerView System was used at the 5-month mark to measure implant mobility as part of the clinician’s assessment of readiness for restoration.
A 66-year-old patient presented with a fractured, non-restorable tooth #3. After robotic-guided implant placement and full restoration, the InnerView System was used to measure implant mobility two years post-op, supporting the clinician’s assessment of long-term stability.
A 71-year-old patient complained of bite discomfort near a recently placed crown. While X-rays and occlusion tests showed nothing abnormal, the InnerView System measured elevated mobility in an adjacent tooth. Further clinical evaluation identified it as the source of pain and supported immediate treatment.
A 74-year-old patient reported a vague sensation of looseness while jogging but showed no clinical or radiographic signs of implant instability. InnerView scans showed consistent mobility readings across implants #12–15 and #19, which, together with Dr. Golan’s clinical evaluation, supported the decision to avoid unnecessary intervention.